What you might also notice is that Google seems to want a measure of control over how the news is presented. Sure, you can get att RSS feeds (I'll show you that later), but for the most part - the items you see in your library are a result of someone publishing this content. Perhaps in the future, this could be a large revenue source for Google?
When you read an article - the layout is quite nice - take a look at this:
What about publishing?
Publishing to the Library seems pretty dirt-simple. Take a look at what kind of information I had to add to publish my own edition:
Also, when setting up your edition - you get to see how it runs on various devices. This is quit a slick interface for what might seems to be a serious point of frustration for content creators. The options don't appear to be extensive - but it's a great starting point:
So, while content creation is beyond the scope of this article - what's clear is that creating and pushing content to Currents is quick, easy and likely to be more powerful as use ramps up. Incidentally, you find this blog in Google Currents by searching for "Blogging Calwell" and then adding the library.
Issues
While pagination is always tricky - I can imagine taking content from the web in this automated form is going to be more difficult if the creators try to exert more control. Looking at one such article on Fast Company I noticed a text overlap at the top of the screen.
It appears as though the headline of the library was placed under the main logo for the company. What's to blame here is likely the lack of space, but if this were text you'd want to read - this may really effect your enjoyment of the article. I expect to see lots of these kinds of things that need to be worked out
Moreover, Google is setting a dangerous precedent with the settings screen:
This format, by far, goes out of it's way to break all the common Google interface conventions for settings screens. Given that keeping a common set of interface elements is essential to the ease of getting around and usage, this should be worked on to retain a similar look and feel so people are not confused. Google has it's own set of guidelines that appear to clearly have been broken here.
What about Google Reader?
This is clearly not a replacement for that. Google Reader is incredibly useful for getting through massive amounts of news items. Currents is more like taking a slow walk through those same items. Given that, you can actually get to your linked Google Reader subscriptions in the "Add" screen. Scroll down to find the "Google Reader" option
So, Currents looks like a winner. The amazing platform support, the ease fo publishing content and a reading experience that will likely only get better as Google leverages it's own ecosystem in the application. If I were Flipboard, I might be more than a little worried.








